寫推薦信的注意事項：
什麼時候開始要求推薦人幫你寫推薦信呢?一般來說，一旦你確定你要申請的學校就要著手準備推薦信的事情了，然後根據不同學校的決定和你個人的喜好來決定是通過網路來提交推薦信呢還是提供普通的紙質版本。下面是幾個在寫推薦信的時候要注意的事項：
一定要給推薦人留有充足的時間來準備推薦信。
每個申請人可能都會申請多所學校，所以需要多個版本的推薦信，雖然不同學校問的問題有所重複，但是還是有所不同。如果你希望推薦人給你寫一封有份量的推薦信，那么請你儘量提前通知他們。你可能覺得，不就是幾份推薦信嗎?可是，每個工作的人都很忙，再加上申請 mba 的時間一般是年底，公司里的事情可能更多，還有，你可能不是唯一的一個要求這個人寫推薦信的人，所以越早準備越好。
注意提醒推薦信的截止日期。
在你要求推薦人寫信時，請你注意提醒推薦信必須提交的日期，以免錯過申請時機。如果是網路提交的，在截止日期當天提交就可以。如果是郵遞的，則還要考慮郵遞的時間問題。
讓推薦人了解你的職業發展規劃。
為了讓推薦人寫出有說服力的推薦信，建議申請人找個機會和推薦人好好聊一下自己的職業發展規劃，讓推薦人對你的職業方向有更為清晰的思路，這樣寫出的推薦信才是有的放矢。申請人可以給推薦人提供自己的簡歷，必要時可以提供學校要求的小論文，以讓推薦人對你有更深入的了解。
推薦信要以“例”服人。
如果推薦信只是泛泛而談，而沒有具體的日常工作中的例子，讓人覺得有血沒有肉，活生生的一個例子頂得上前言萬語，所以申請人可以幫助推薦人回憶一下交往中的趣事，讓他們把這些例子套用到推薦信中去。
不同的推薦信要相輔相成。
如果學校要求多封推薦信，申請人可以要求不同的推薦人強調不同的側面，而不是幾個人一個模板，寫出來一樣的東西，這樣就失去了多封推薦信的意義。如果不同的推薦人把側重點放在不同的地方，這樣勾勒出來的形象可能更為清晰和具體，因為對申請人有利。
美國的商學院一般都要求申請者有2～3封，被認為是學校從多方面了解申請者的最有力的證明材料。一般來說，推薦信雖然不會產生十分神奇的作用，但對那些處於錄與不錄邊緣的申請，卻常有意想不到的效果。那么選擇什麼樣的人寫推薦信最合適呢？以下有三條原則可供參考：
一、 美國商學院最青睞的是那些與申請者有過密切關係，熟悉其領導能力、組織能力或學術水平的人寫的。推薦人必須站在客觀的立場上評價你，千萬不要選一個很有名卻對你並不了解的人，因為商學院希望推薦人能提供具體細節。
二、 選擇真正欣賞你的人，只有這樣的人才會願意花時間和精力為你寫出一封好信。如果寫得潦草倉促或是充滿了敷衍套話，將使錄取委員會對你的印象大打折扣。
三、 選擇能夠說明你的關鍵品質和獨特個性的人。他最好能就你的管理才能、智力水平、為人處事等某一方面做深入闡述，寫出一封充滿申請者獨特個性的推薦信。
找八桿子打不著的人，反而讓人覺得你不可信。一般找自己的導師，系主任，熟悉你的教授、公司領導比較有效。當然，如果有一位公司直接主管、國際有名的教授能充任你的推薦人，你申請學校系科的主管教授又是這位知名教授的學生，或朋友，那這樣的推薦信無疑十分有力。
你應該在計畫遞交申請材料的期限前三個月左右開始尋找推薦人。選好推薦人後，接下來要做的就是和他（她）坦誠地面談一次，向他（她）解釋清楚你需要什麼樣的幫助。告訴他（她）你想申請哪些學校，為什麼選擇那些學校。最好能向推薦人提供一份你的完整詳細的簡歷，以方便寫推薦信。如果你認為推薦者應就某幾個方面作一下重點描述，應該提前準備一份書面材料，列舉那些你認為你的推薦人可以著手的地方。
不僅要在評價方面有特色，更重要的是要有具體的事例作為佐證。許多申請者的推薦信都會犯一種致命錯誤，那就是其中都充滿了"excellent"，"distinguished"， "ambitious"，"natural born leader"這樣的頂級讚美之詞，卻沒有具體的例子來支持這些"論點"。這樣不僅不能使商學院增加對申請者的了解，反而會讓他們覺得無法對申請者有一個真實的認識。申請者在和寫信的人溝通時，尤其要注意這點。
一般說來，商學院寄來的申請材料中都附有表格。推薦人可按照表格逐項填寫，如果遇到難以評價的項目可以寫I don’t know或unable to judge。如果沒有既定的表格，推薦人可以自行按書信格式寫。
november 2，20xx
letter of reference: kathleen floyd
dear prospective employer:
this is a letter of recommendation for kathleen floyd。 i have only known kathleen since may，20xx but i believe she is one of the finest students i have ever had。 i highly recommend her to you。
kathleen took my introductory accountancy course in may。 she excelled，earning a high a i was impressed with her intelligent and insightful questions，by her understanding of fairly complex issues，her work ethic，interpersonal skills and team skills。 it is abundantly clear that kathleen is a top student。 at the university of shaaxi at xian，china she earned a business administration degree and was the top ranked student。 students like her and wanted to participate with her。 even though she is so bright and has a tremendous work ethic，she is also a great person。 she is easy to talk to，speaks excellent english and has great interpersonal skills。
i encourage you to closely examine kathleen’s resume。 you will see that she has had numerous jobs that deal with working with people。 this reinforces what i tell you about herexcellent interpersonal skills。 she is friendly and personable。
in closing，there are three super qualities that kathleen has。 they are not just good qualities，but some of the best you will find in any person。 they are her knowledge，work ethic and interpersonal skills，including language skills。 i highly recommend this greatlady to you。 i know you will make your organization better。
if you have any questions，please contact me at ______。edu。 i am on a sabbatical to ireland until january，so this is the best way to contact me。
sincerely
想要為你的推薦信找到合適的撰寫人可不是件容易的事兒。u.s news採訪了chioma isiadinso，前卡耐基梅隆大學和哈佛商學院的招生官員，同時也是《頂級商學院的申請秘訣》的作者。在書中，他給出了很多如何為你的推薦信選擇最佳的撰稿人來為你的申請增光添彩的建議。一起來看看：
finding the right people to write your letters of recommendation is no simple task. so u.s. news asked, a former admissions official at carnegie mellon university and harvard business school and author of the book the best business schools' admissions secrets, to offer advice on choosing someone who can portray you in the best and most accurate light.
1. who should applicants approach to write their letters of recommendation? former professors? employers? a mix?
typically, recommendations for business school should come from individuals who have supervised the candidate and have a clear vantage point of a candidate's managerial potential and contributions to the organization, [as well as a] perspective of how he or she functions within a team. [the] majority of business schools require two recommendation letters, and for most applicants the ideal option is a current supervisor and a former supervisor who can attest in great detail about the candidate and the value he or she can provide to the business school community. in cases where a school requires three recommendations (as is the case for programs like harvard business school and the stanford university graduate school of business), another perspective such as a recommendation from community service [organizers] or from faculty who can attest to who you are beyond the classroom performance can be useful.
there are instances where a professor recommendation could be useful. these are cases where the candidate is an early career candidate with very limited work experience; in such instances, the critical information for the recommender to highlight is not basic information about the candidate's intellect and how well he or she did in the class, but rather detailed examples/anecdotes that vividly describe the candidate in terms of how he or she has enriched a class [and] character traits that can reinforce that the candidate is mature to handle business school despite being younger and possessing less work experience compared to the rest of the applicant pool. professors who can attest to your college leadership track record [and] your ability to take initiative can be useful recommendation letters at the end of the day.
2. is it important that the letter's writer has worked with the applicant closely on a day-to-day basis?
absolutely. recommendations that are most memorable and useful in evaluating a candidate are the ones that have detailed descriptions about the candidate. the more closely the recommender has worked with the candidate, the more examples he or she can share. i often see applicants opting for recommendations from more senior individuals who barely know them. in such cases, it is no surprise that such reference letters tend to be generic, lack examples, and are ineffective in painting a clear picture of who the candidate is.
3. do letters of recommendation from prominent figures carry much weight if they've had minimal contact with the applicant?
admissions people are very savvy and can see through the 'big-titled' recommendation with little substance. applicants should focus on former bosses or current bosses who have real experiences they can draw from. generic recommendation letters are wasted opportunities to differentiate yourself from your competition. i read my fair share of generic recommendation letters when serving on harvard business school's admissions board and such recommendations that came from alumni or prominent figures were easy to spot and did little to endear the candidate to the admissions board. it is always better to have a 'mid-ranked' recommender but with insight and detailed descriptions about you that allows the admissions board to get a three-dimensional view of who you are as a person.
相關內容
企管碩士MBA教授英文推薦信
MBA推薦信推薦人
MBA留學推薦信的要求
MBA英文推薦信格式範文
mba推薦信 範文
MBA推薦信十大技巧（英文）
推薦信--MBA（英文）
北大mba推薦信
MBA課程英文推薦信
攻讀MBA單位推薦信