to me march 28th was a lucky day. it was on that particular
evening that i found myself at central stage, in the
spotlight. winning the 21st century·ericsson cup seventh
national english speaking competition is a memory that i shall
treasure and one that will surely stay.
more important than winning the cup is the friendship that has
been established and developed among the contestants, and the
chance to communicate offstage in addition to competing
onstage. also the competition helps boost public speaking in
china, a skill hitherto undervalued.
for me, though, the competition is a more personal experience.
habitually shy, i had been reluctant to take part in any such
activities. encouraged by my friends, however, i made a
last-minute decision to give it a try. in the course of
preparation i somehow rediscovered myself, a truer me.
i found that, after all, i like communicating with other
people; that exchanging views can be so much fun—and so much
rewarding, both emotionally and intellectually; that public
speaking is most effective when you are least guarded; and
that it is essential to success in every walk of life.
at a more practical level, i realized knowing what you are
going to say and how you are going to say it are equally
important. to take the original ideas out of your head and
transplant them, so to speak, to that of others, you need to
have an organized mind. this ability improves with training.
yet there should not be any loss or addition or distortion in
the process. those ideas that finally find their way into
another head need to be recognizably yours. language is a
means to transmit information, not a means to obstruct
communication. it should be lucid to be penetrating.
in china, certain public speaking skills have been unduly
emphasized. will it really help, we are compelled to ask, to
bang at the podium or yell at the top of your lungs, if you
have come with a poorly organized speech, a muddled mind, and
unwillingness to truly share your views?
above all, the single most important thing i learnt was that
as a public speaker, you need to pay attention, first and
foremost, to the content of your speech. and second, the
structure of your speech: how one idea relates and progresses
to another.
only after these come delivery and non-verbal communication:
speed control, platform manner, and so on. pronunciation is
important, yet of greater importance is this: is your language
competent enough to express your ideas exactly the way you
intend them to be understood?
i was informed afterwards that i was chosen to be the winner
for my appropriately worded speech, excellent presence and
quick-witted response. in so remarking, the judges clearly
showed their preference: they come to listen for meaningful
ideas, not for loose judgments, nor easy laughters.
some contestants failed to address their questions head on.
some were able to, but did not know where to stop—the dragging
on betrayed their lack of confidence. the root cause was that
they did not listen attentively to the questions. or they were
thinking of what they had prepared.
as i said in my speech, it is vitally important that we young
people do more serious thinking ... to take them [issues like
globalization] on and give them honest thinking is the first
step to be prepared for both opportunities and challenges
coming our way. we need to respond honestly.
a competition like this draws talented students from all over
the country. and of course, i learnt more things than just
about public speaking. since in th
final analysis, public
speaking is all about effective communication. and this goes
true for all communications, whatever their setting.
and the following is the final version of my speech:
globalization:
opportunities and challenges
for chinas younger generation
thirty years ago, american president richard nixon made an
epoch-making visit to china, a country still isolated at that
time. premier zhou enlai said to him, your handshake came
over the vastest ocean in the world—twenty-five years of no
communication. thirty years since, china and america have
exchanged many handshakes. the fundamental implication of this
example is that the need to communicate across differences in
culture and ideology is not only felt by the two countries but
many other nations as well.
as we can see today, environmentalists from different
countries are making joint efforts to address the issue of
global warming, economists are seeking solutions to financial
crises that rage in a particular region but nonetheless
cripple the world economy, and politicians and diplomats are
getting together to discuss the issue of combating terrorism.
peace and prosperity has become a common goal that we are
striving for all over the world. underlying this mighty trend
of global communication is the echo of e. m. forsters words
only connect!
with the it revolution, traditional boundaries of human
society fall away. our culture, politics, society and commerce
are being sloshed into one large melting pot of humanity. in
this interlinked world, there are no outsiders, for a
disturbance in one place is likely to impact other parts of
the globe. we have begun to realize that a world divided
cannot endure.
china is now actively integrating into the world. our recent
entry to the wto is a good example. for decades, we have taken
pride in being self-reliant, but now we realize the importance
of participating in and contributing to a broader economic
order. from a precarious role in the world arena to our
present wto membership, we have come a long way.
but what does the way ahead look like? in some parts of the
world people are demonstrating against globalization. are they
justified, then, in criticizing the globalizing world? instead
of narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor, they say, globalization enables the developed nations to swallow the developing nations wealth in debts and interest. globalization, they argue, should be about a common interest in every other nations economic health. we are reminded by karl marx that capital goes beyond national borders and eludes control from any other entity. this has become a reality. multinational corporations are seeking the lowest cost, the largest market, and the most favourable policy. they are often powerful lobbyists in government decision-making, ruthless expansionists in the global market and a devastating presence to local businesses.
for china, still more challenges exist. how are we going to ensure a smooth transition from the planned economy to a market-based one? how to construct a legal system that is sound enough and broad enough to respond to the needs of a dynamic society? how to maintain our cultural identity in an increasingly homogeneous world? and how to define greatness in our rise as a peace-loving nation? globalization entails questions that concern us all. like many young people my age in china, i want to see my country get prosperous and enjoy respect in t
e international community. but it seems to me that mere patriotism is not just enough. it is vitally important that we young people do more serious thinking and broaden our mind to bigger issues. there might never be easy answers to those issues such as globalization, but to take them on and give them honest thinking is the first step to be prepared for both opportunities and challenges coming our way. this is also one of the thoughts that came to me while preparing this speech.
第七屆全國英語演講比賽冠軍得主演講稿
to me march 28th was a lucky day. it was on that particular
evening that i found myself at central stage, in the
spotlight. winning the 21st century·ericsson cup seventh
national english speaking competition is a memory that i shall
treasure and one that will surely stay.
more important than winning the cup is the friendship that has
been established and developed among the contestants, and the
chance to communicate offstage in addition to competing
onstage. also the competition helps boost public speaking in
china, a skill hitherto undervalued.
for me, though, the competition is a more personal experience.
habitually shy, i had been reluctant to take part in any such
activities. encouraged by my friends, however, i made a
last-minute decision to give it a try. in the course of
preparation i somehow rediscovered myself, a truer me.
i found that, after all, i like communicating with other
people; that exchanging views can be so much fun—and so much
rewarding, both emotionally and intellectually; that public
speaking is most effective when you are least guarded; and
that it is essential to success in every walk of life.
at a more practical level, i realized knowing what you are
going to say and how you are going to say it are equally
important. to take the original ideas out of your head and
transplant them, so to speak, to that of others, you need to
have an organized mind. this ability improves with training.
yet there should not be any loss or addition or distortion in
the process. those ideas that finally find their way into
another head need to be recognizably yours. language is a
means to transmit information, not a means to obstruct
communication. it should be lucid to be penetrating.
in china, certain public speaking skills have been unduly
emphasized. will it really help, we are compelled to ask, to
bang at the podium or yell at the top of your lungs, if you
have come with a poorly organized speech, a muddled mind, and
unwillingness to truly share your views?
above all, the single most important thing i learnt was that
as a public speaker, you need to pay attention, first and
foremost, to the content of your speech. and second, the
structure of your speech: how one idea relates and progresses
to another.
only after these come delivery and non-verbal communication:
speed control, platform manner, and so on. pronunciation is
important, yet of greater importance is this: is your language
competent enough to express your ideas exactly the way you
intend them to be understood?
i was informed afterwards that i was chosen to be the winner
for my appropriately worded speech, excellent presence and
quick-witted response. in so remarking, the judges clearly
showed their preference: they come to listen for meaningful
ideas, not for loose judgments, nor easy laughters.
some contestants failed to address their questions head on.
some were able to, but did not know where to stop—the dragging
on betrayed their lack of confidence. the root cause was that
they did not listen attentively to the questions. or they were
thinking of what they had prepared.
as i said in my speech, it is vitally important that we young
people do more serious thinking ... to take them [issues like
globalization] on and give them honest thinking is the first
step to be prepared for both opportunities and challenges
coming our way. we need to respond honestly.
a competition like this draws talented students from all over
the country. and of course, i learnt more things than just
about publ
ic speaking. since in th
以下是由應屆畢業生演講稿網站為大家整理提供的《超級演說家》第二季冠軍北大才女劉媛媛在《超級演說家》節目現場演講稿合集，非常正能量，非常勵志。
《醜女莫作怪》(海選)
有一天我很認真的問我哥，你說我為什麼嫁不出去?我哥看著我的臉更認真的回答我說，你一直不知道自己長得醜嗎?我說不知道啊。他說這個世界上很多事情都跟長相有關，比如說:灰姑娘被王子選中是因為她窮嗎?那是因為她長得好看。可是長得醜難道就沒有救了嗎?
第一種典型嘰歪女，每天都在微博上轉發精彩語錄，例如我會無理取鬧，會嘮嘮叨叨，會流淚，會跟你爭吵，理直氣壯的都跟夢露一樣，但是一個男人如果他應付不了我最差的一面，他就不值得擁有我最好的一面，我就一個目的，就是想看看你是不是還在乎我。我每次看到這種話都覺得說的太好了就是這種感覺，必須評論轉發，遇見這樣的女生你就甩了吧。
第二種類型就是偽女漢子，動不動來個女的只要很粗魯，就覺得自己是女漢子，其實大家真的誤會了，女漢子這三個女代表的是柔情，漢代表的是幹練，每次你委婉的提醒她們對方就會把霸氣側漏的模式調出來，噗噗噗的噴射你，然後說你虛偽，痛心疾首質問你，說你敢不敢做你自己，我倒是想問問她們我能不能不做我自己啊，我能不能做湯唯、周迅、范冰冰啊我。
親朋好友常常跟你說你找不到男朋友是因為你標準太高了，快別信他們，他們的意思是說你根本就配不上你所喜歡的那個標準的男人。一個醜橘子，它都會因為自己長得醜而努力的變甜一點，我們還好意思不努力嗎?你所喜歡的那個標準的男人他都會因為自己長得醜而努力的變甜一點，我們還好意思不努力嗎?
最後呢，我送給大家四句話：命里有時終須有，命里無時要強求，想找對象，不怕醜，努力就有男朋友。
《面對不成功的人生》
如何面對不成功的人生，首先，什麼是不成功的人生。我覺得，我、包括現場所有的你們，誰都不能說自己的人生是不成功的人生，因為你的人生根本還沒有結束，只要我們還沒死，我們只是在人生中遇到了失敗而已，誰都不許說自己的人生是不成功的人生。
媛媛告訴我們說啊，只要人還沒死無法判斷成功失敗，社會上流行的心靈雞湯經常告訴我們一個道理，就是只要你堅持，只要你玩命，是一定會成功的，而且萬一你不成功，每個人對成功的標準不一樣，你只要有心靈的滿足，那也算是一種成功。我不知道在座各位的自我欺騙能力如何，反正我總是會發現人生這齣戲我不是主角，只是個死跑龍套的。人生這齣戲我是你、你們所有人人生中的龍套，但我是我自己人生的主角，所以在我遭遇失敗的時候，在我被觀眾喝倒彩的時候，我一個人也能而且必須會唱下去。對，我是北大的，但高中的時候誰都想不到我是一個差等生，是那種不寫作業全年級兩百多人我考一百八十多名的那種差等生，然後有一天這個差等生突然異想天開想要考北大，然後像個神經病一樣去努力，當然聯考的時候我還是沒考上。有人說你失敗了，我失敗了嗎?承認失敗多容易啊，比那種日復一日的那種堅持跟忍耐容易多了!但是我不服氣!四年之後考研我又考回北大了。所以說，一個人他一輩子不做任何嘗試，他不做任何冒險的事，他也不為任何事情努力，他永遠都不會失敗，他都沒有資格遭遇失敗!但是你不同，你做過夢，你發過瘋，你哭過、笑過、奮鬥過，你愛過、恨過，你也後悔過，於是啊，芸芸眾生中那么那么普通的一個你卻拼盡全力活出最好的自己，又有誰有資格說你的人生不成功。
一將功成萬骨枯，一個分子無數分母，成功這件事其實成功率極低，畢竟猴子都知道往香蕉比較多的樹上爬，權衡得失、趨利避害，是每一個動物的本能。可是在場的每一位朋友你們知道嗎，追求這種近乎渺茫的成功正是我們人類區別於其他動物之所在，因為你幾乎注定會失敗，所以你期待成功的每一天，都充滿了一種叫做忐忑的幸福。當你拼盡全力失敗依舊來臨的時候，你會知道你的一生因為浪費在理想上，所以它從來不曾被浪費。
每一個理想都值得你拿一生去拚命，人生這么短，我就選擇做那種又盲目又熱情的傻瓜，永遠年輕，永遠熱淚盈眶，永遠相信夢想，相信努力的意義，相信遺憾比失敗更可怕，因為不成功的人生它只是不完美，但是它完整。
泰戈爾說：“飛鳥從天空飛過，可它並沒有留下痕跡。”可是我的朋友，你知道嗎，你自己應該懂，你自己在這片天空飛翔過。
《年輕人能為世界做點什麼》
我是法學院的一名學生，我的每一門課的教授都在他的課堂上講過這樣一句話，他們常常說：法律是這么規定的，但是現實生活中……。現實生活是一種很神奇的生活，在現實生活中，那些尊重規則的老實人，往往一輩子都默默無聞，反倒是那些弄虛作假的人會名利雙收。於是乎像我這樣的年輕人就經常有那些看著很有經驗的前輩過來拍拍你的肩膀跟你說，年輕人，你還不懂。我想問的是，我們年輕人能為這個世界做什麼。
總有一天，銀行行長會是90後，企業家會是90後，甚至xx都會是90後，但全社會都被90後占領的時候，我想問你們90後們，大家想把這個社會變成什麼樣。我知道不是每一個人都能成為站在風口浪尖上去把握國家命運的人物，你我不過是再普通不過的升斗小民，是這個龐大的社會機器上一顆小小的螺絲釘。
讀書的時候每天都被父母耳提命面，說你幹啥你都不要給我耽誤學習;畢業的時候呢，到處投簡歷，淒悽惶惶的等一家企業收留自己;逢年過節被逼婚，結婚買了房子，要花自己年輕時最好的20年來償還貸款，讓每一個年輕人都忙著生存，沒有夢想，沒有時間關心政治，沒有時間關心環境，沒有時間關心國家的命運，還哪有什麼精力去為這個社會去做什麼。
但是後來我發現，還是有一件事，你跟我都可以做到，這件事就是：我們這代人，在我們老去的路上一定一定不要變壞。不要變成你年輕時候最痛恨最厭惡的那種成年人。如果將來你去路邊擺攤，你就不要賣地溝油小吃，你不要缺斤短兩。你將來開了工廠當了老闆，你不要偷工減料生產一些次品。
每一個普通人在自己的崗位上做一個好人是有非常非常嚴重意義的，因為我們每一個人生下來就注定會改變世界。我是一個學法律的，如果我將來是一個公正嚴明的法官，那么這個社會就因為多了一個好法官而變好了一點點。
我希望大家都記住，即使給了你十萬個理由去作惡，你都要保持自己的操守跟底線，僅僅就是因為一個理由：你不是一個禽獸!你是一個人。我更希望我們所有的90後們，你們都能成為那種難能可貴的年輕人，一輩子都嫉惡如仇，你絕不隨波逐流，你絕不趨炎附勢，你絕不摧眉折腰，你絕不放棄自己的原則，你絕不絕不失望於人性。
所以我親愛的90後們，如果再有人跟你們說，年輕人你不要看不慣，你要適應這個社會，這時候你就應該像一個真正的勇士一樣直面他，你告訴他：“我跟你不一樣，我不是來適應社會的，我是來改變社會的。”
《請不以結婚為目的的戀愛吧》
據說每個人都曾經暗戀過別人， 你們還記得自己十七八歲的時候暗戀的那個人嗎? 她是那種學習很好的、長相清秀的那種沈佳宜，還是那種愛打籃球的、特別酷的流川楓?你現在再想起來他的時候， 你是在微笑還是在沉默? 還是你覺得你當年的求之不得如今看過來不過如此。
我發現我們最捨得去愛一個人的時候，恰恰就是暗戀的時候。
我從大二開始就暗戀一個男生， 暗戀是一件驚心動魄的事情， 我每次看到他跟他說話的時候都跟打仗一樣，努力的表現成談笑風生的樣子，我害怕他知道，我害怕他不知道，我更 害怕他知道但是他假裝不知道， 暗戀也是一件寂寞孤獨的事情， 我覺得他的名只有放在我的嘴巴裡面才安全。
你們覺得男生跟女生之間有純友誼嗎? (沒有) 有， 只要一個打死不說， 另一個裝傻到底。
從頭到尾我扮演的角色就是他最講義氣的哥們， 每次他需要幫助的時候我第一個兩肋插刀的衝過去。他說，我是最懂他的人。我怎么不懂了， 沒有人比我更了解他。我知道，他喜歡那種嬌小玲瓏的女生，我從一個一百二十多斤的胖子開始減肥，甩掉十幾斤的肉。他也常常跟別人誇我說我是那種懂事的好姑娘。對呀，因為除了懂事我還不知道能做什麼。 我想給他我的一切，但我什麼都沒有;我想為他放棄一切，我也沒什麼好放棄的。
你們呢，你們還記得就是喜歡一個人喜歡到不行了的那種感覺嗎?某天你愛上一個人， 突然好像有了軟肋，又好像是有了鎧甲，可能經歷過幾段傷害、經歷過幾段刻骨銘心的愛情之後，他們變得更聰明、更理智、更加的有技巧了。但是我想問你們，你們真的不相信愛情了嗎?那你為什麼看《鐵達尼號》 、看《北京愛情故事》你還會哭?你真的寧願變得聰明、變得老練而不衝動嗎? 不管你是涉世未深還是說你早已經愛的傷痕累累了， 你在心裏面你都渴望有那么一份愛情，它是真摯的，它是專一的，它是持久的。
如果一個人他在愛情裡面因為愛的真，因為愛別人愛得深，他被傷害了，他看起來很蠢嗎，很可悲嗎?不，那些考慮好了各種條件去結婚，到結婚的時候才發現沒有一點關於愛的 回憶，愛情好像從來沒有發生過，我覺得那些人才可悲。所以我希望咱們還可以再試著像一 個十七八歲的少女一樣， 不以結婚為目的去愛一個人。
我在心裏面愛他愛的聲嘶力竭的他聽不到，我在心裡愛他愛的天崩地裂的他也看不到，但我像一個孤獨的女戰神一樣，又狼狽又勇敢的這么愛著他，等到我死的那一天我都願意回想起來這件事情，我都覺得它可貴，我覺得它美好，我都不會覺得後悔。
如果有人現在跟我說我愛你是以結婚為目的的或者我以結婚為目的的在跟你戀愛著， 他太小看我，他也太小看我的愛情， 因為對於一個二十三歲了還不能接地氣的理想主義的姑娘來說，一輩子不結婚是挺可怕的，但更可怕的是有些人他一輩子在婚姻里，可是從來從來沒有得到過愛情。
《不作不會活》(冠軍爭奪戰)
XX年，十大網路流行語之一。no zuo，no die，大家都聽過嗎，不作就不會死。但是我今天想讓大家記住的不是no zuo，no die，而是no zuo，no die，no life.
“作”是什麼?“作”就是不安現狀的瞎折騰。我這個人就挺愛“作”的，我來參加超級演說家這個節目已經被我哥罵了無數次了。他說你這就是沒事找事瞎折騰，你又不是學表演的，又不是學主持的，你一個學法律的去參加一個電視節目，對你的將來有什麼用?可能我就是愛“作”吧。我突然覺得每天都重複的生活很沒有意思，所以我就來了。我自“作”，我也能自受。
每次寫稿子都要熬夜，熬到一兩點，每次站在舞台上等著大家投票，都會緊張的雙拳緊握，但是我一點兒也不後悔，我會永遠永遠都記得這些時刻的。
這個舞台上有人比我還能“作”，一會你們就會看到他，他就是我的新晉偶像，林義傑。他媽媽對她的期待就是好好地念個大學，將來當醫生，當老師，當什麼都好，但是他選擇了體育，一條風險性極大，成功率又極低的路。他喜歡跑步去冒險，他的雙腿跑過北極，跑過南極，跑過全世界最大的熱帶沙漠——撒哈拉沙漠。我心裡就在感慨，這人的一生就是“作”死的一生啊。這個死還不是說你在人生路上摔了一個跤，失了一個伴，是真的會死的!但是我也在感慨，他的一生是特別特別精彩的一生，如果他按照父母的意願去考了大學，他以後也可能會成功，但是他在的人生當中，看到的不僅僅是一個有一個的成功，而是一個 又一個的生命奇蹟。
親愛的朋友，從小到大我們都在聽著別人的聲音給自己的人生劃格子，左邊的這條線是要學業有成，右邊的這條線是一定要有一個一個安穩的好工作，上面這條線是三十歲之前要結婚，下面這條線就是你結了婚就一定得生個孩子，好像只有在這個格子裡面才是安全的，才被別人認為是幸福的。一旦你想跳出這個格子，就會有人說你“作”。可是我知道每個人年輕的時候，心裡都會有一點想去“作”的衝動。你明明應該考一個經濟系，法律系，土木工程系，你說你要學表演，你要去演電影;你明明應該找一個合適的人就結婚，你還在等，你還說自己想要真正的愛情。其實大部分的年輕人，都根本不知道自己想要什麼，你們知道自己將來想要過什麼樣的生活嗎?你們想想，其實我是不知道的。我根本不知道我將來想過什麼樣的生活，去哪個城市，做什麼工作，我只是還知道自己不想要什麼：不想要那種循規蹈矩，安安穩穩，平平淡淡的日子，不想要那種一眼就可以看到死的那種人生。
你可能會說，人生嘛，平平淡淡才是真，瞎“作”什麼呀。我每次聽到一個二三十歲的年輕人說這種話的時候，我不是覺得他錯，我只是覺得很可惜，這個世界那么大，那么精彩，你什麼都還沒看到過的時候卻甘心的呆在一個格子裡面，循規蹈矩，安分守己的生活，這樣的生活沒有任何的風險，也不會被別人嘲笑，但是我總覺得呀，一個沒有把百酒都嘗遍的人，他是不大懂得清水之味的。一個一輩子都安分守己不敢“作”的人，他從來也不曾擁有一個精彩豐富的人生。
畢竟，no zuo，no die，就no life!
《寒門貴子》
在這段演講開始之前，我先問大家一個問題：你們當中有誰覺得自己是家境普通，甚至出身貧寒，將來想要出人頭地只能靠自己?(幾乎全舉手)你們當中又有誰覺得自己是有錢人家的小孩，起碼奮鬥的時候可以從父母那兒得到一點助力?(無人舉手)
前些日子有一個在銀行工作了十年的資深的hr(人力資源管理師)他在網路上發了一篇帖子叫做《寒門再難出貴子》，意思是說在當下我們這個社會裡面寒門的小孩他想要出人頭地想要成功比我們父輩的那一代更難了。這個帖子引起了特別廣泛的討論，你們覺得這句話有道理嗎?
先拿我自己說，我們家就是出身寒門的，我們家都不算寒門，我們家都沒有門。現在想想，我都不知道我爸跟我媽那么普通的一對農村夫婦，他們是怎么把三個孩子我跟我兩個哥哥從農村供出來上大學、上研究生。我一直都覺得自己特別幸運，我爸跟我媽都沒怎么讀過書，我媽連國小一年級都沒上過，她居然覺得讀書很重要，她吃再多的苦也要讓我們三個孩子上大學。我一直也不會拿自己跟那些比如說家庭富裕的小孩做比較，說我們之間有什麼不同，或者有什麼不平等，但是我們必須要承認這個世界是有一些不平等的。他們有很多優越的條件我們都沒有，他們有很多的捷徑我們也沒有，但是我們不能抱怨。
每一個人的人生都不盡相同的，有些人出生就含著金鑰匙，有些人出生連爸媽都沒有——人生跟人生是沒有可比性的，我們的人生是怎么樣完全決定於自己的感受。你一輩子都在感受抱怨，那你的一生就是抱怨的一生;你一輩子都在感受感動，那你的一生就是感動的一生;你一輩子都立志於改變這個社會，那你的一生就是鬥士的一生。
英國有一部紀錄片叫做《人生七年》，片中訪問了十二個來自不同階層的七歲的小孩，每七年再回去重新訪問這些小孩，到了影片的最後就發現：富人的孩子還是富人，窮人的孩子還是窮人。但是裡面有一個叫尼克的貧窮的小孩，他到最後通過自己的奮鬥變成了一名大學教授，可見命運的手掌裡面是有漏網之魚的。而且現實生活中寒門子弟逆襲的例子更是數不勝數。
所以當我們遭遇到失敗的時候，我們不能把所有的原因都歸結到出身上去，更不能去抱怨自己的父母為什麼不如別人的父母。因為家境不好，它並沒有斬斷一個人他成功的所有的可能。當我在人生中遇到很大困難的時候，我就會在北京的大街上走一走看著人來人往，那時候我就想：“劉媛媛，你在這個城市裡面真的是依無所依，你有的只是你自己，你什麼都沒有，你現在能做的就是單槍匹馬在這個社會上殺出一條路來。”
這段演講到現在已經是最後一次了，其實我剛剛在問的時候就發現了：我們大部分人都不是出身豪門的，我們都要靠自己!所以你要相信：命運給你一個比別人低的起點是想告訴你，讓你用你的一生去奮鬥出一個絕地反擊的故事。這個故事關於獨立、關於夢想、關於勇氣、關於堅忍，它不是一個水到渠成的童話，沒有一點點人間疾苦，這個故事是有志者事竟成，破釜沉舟，百二秦關終屬楚，這個故事是苦心人天不負，臥薪嘗膽，三千越甲可吞吳!
全國英語演講比賽冠軍演講稿：Our Future: A Battle between Dreams and Reality
全國英語演講比賽冠軍演講稿：The Doors that are Open to Us
英語演講比賽冠軍演講稿：A Scene to Remember
第七屆全國英語演講比賽冠軍得主演講稿演講範文
銷售冠軍獲獎發言
繪畫比賽冠軍發言稿
如何成為銷售冠軍演講稿
全國演講大賽冠軍演講辭
“21世紀杯”全國英語演講比賽冠軍演講稿
英語演講比賽冠軍:穿越海洋